<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>21st Annual Stanford Digital Economy Best Practices Conference</provider_name><provider_url>https://conferences.law.stanford.edu/bestpractices2024</provider_url><author_name>jcarian</author_name><author_url>https://conferences.law.stanford.edu/bestpractices2024/author/jcarian/</author_url><title>Track D: CIPA and Wiretap Troll Litigation Including Mass Arbitration - 21st Annual Stanford Digital Economy Best Practices Conference</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="Poy2xFIvxM"&gt;&lt;a href="https://conferences.law.stanford.edu/bestpractices2024/sessions/track4d/"&gt;Track D: CIPA and Wiretap Troll Litigation Including Mass Arbitration&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://conferences.law.stanford.edu/bestpractices2024/sessions/track4d/embed/#?secret=Poy2xFIvxM" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Track D: CIPA and Wiretap Troll Litigation Including Mass Arbitration&#x201D; &#x2014; 21st Annual Stanford Digital Economy Best Practices Conference" data-secret="Poy2xFIvxM" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://conferences.law.stanford.edu/bestpractices2024/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>The expanding array of wiretap cases involving pixels and other AdTech cases Reevaluating arbitration provisions and Terms of Use revisions in light of mass arbitration Best practices for resolving or beating troll cases Opt-in vs opt-out remediation</description></oembed>
