<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>30th Annual Stanford Directors' College</provider_name><provider_url>https://conferences.law.stanford.edu/directorscollege2025</provider_url><author_name>jcarian</author_name><author_url>https://conferences.law.stanford.edu/directorscollege2025/author/jcarian/</author_url><title>The Reincorporation Debate: What Directors Need to Know - 30th Annual Stanford Directors' College</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="JiUMew4Cn3"&gt;&lt;a href="https://conferences.law.stanford.edu/directorscollege2025/sessions/breakout-sessions-4d/"&gt;The Reincorporation Debate: What Directors Need to Know&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://conferences.law.stanford.edu/directorscollege2025/sessions/breakout-sessions-4d/embed/#?secret=JiUMew4Cn3" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;The Reincorporation Debate: What Directors Need to Know&#x201D; &#x2014; 30th Annual Stanford Directors' College" data-secret="JiUMew4Cn3" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://conferences.law.stanford.edu/directorscollege2025/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>For many decades, Delaware has been the leading forum for incorporation in the United States, offering a well-established and predictable legal framework and business-friendly courts. However, recent decisions out of Delaware Chancery Court deemed unfavorable to controlling stockholders have prompted some businesses to reevaluate their incorporation choices. Amendments to the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
