{"id":25,"date":"2016-09-07T19:00:33","date_gmt":"2016-09-07T19:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/?page_id=25"},"modified":"2016-09-07T19:46:45","modified_gmt":"2016-09-07T19:46:45","slug":"important-dates-schedule","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/","title":{"rendered":"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

IMPORTANT DATES<\/h2>\n
\n

May 15, 2016: Deadline for Submission of Requests to Present and Requests to Attend<\/p>\n

August 8, 2016: Deadline for Submission of Paper Drafts and\/or Presentation Slides<\/p>\n

CONFERENCE SCHEDULE\u00a0<\/strong>(UPDATED AUGUST 9TH)<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

\n

AUGUST 10, 2016<\/h2>\n

7:00pm \u2013 8:30pm Informal Opening Reception<\/strong>
\nThe Stanford Room, Stanford Park Hotel<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

DAY ONE \u2013 AUGUST 11, 2016<\/h2>\n

7:45am \u2013 Shuttle departs from Stanford Park Hotel to Stanford Law Scholl<\/strong>
\n*The shuttle will make two trips: one at 7:45am and one at 8:15am<\/em><\/p>\n

8:15am \u2013 8:45am Registration & Continental Breakfast<\/strong>
\nPaul Brest Hall, Munger Graduate Residences<\/em><\/p>\n

8:45am \u2013 8:55am Welcome<\/strong>
\nPaul Brest Hall, Munger Graduate Residences<\/em><\/p>\n

8:55am \u2013 10:25am Opening Plenary Session<\/strong>
\nPaul Brest Hall, Munger Graduate Residences<\/em><\/p>\n

10:25am \u2013 10:50am Break<\/strong>
\nPaul Brest Hall, Munger Graduate Residences<\/em><\/p>\n

10:50am \u2013 12:45pm Breakout Session I<\/strong>
\nClassroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/em><\/p>\n

12:45pm \u2013 1:45pm Lunch<\/strong>
\nPaul Brest Hall, Munger Graduate Residences<\/em><\/p>\n

1:45pm \u2013 3:40pm \u00a0Breakout Session II
\nClassroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/em><\/p>\n

3:40pm \u2013 4:10pm Break<\/strong>
\nCrocker Garden, Stanford Law School<\/em><\/p>\n

4:10pm \u2013 5:05pm Breakout Session III<\/strong>
\nClassroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/em><\/p>\n

6:00pm \u00a0Reception and Dinner<\/strong>
\nPaul Brest Hall, Munger Graduate Residences<\/em><\/p>\n

8:00pm Shuttle departs from Stanford Law School to Stanford Park Hotel<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

DAY TWO \u2013 AUGUST\u00a012, 2016<\/h2>\n

7:45am \u2013 Shuttle departs from Stanford Park Hotel to Stanford Law Scholl<\/strong>
\n*The shuttle will make two trips: one at 7:45am and one at 8:15am<\/p>\n

8:15am \u2013 8:45am Registration and Breakfast<\/strong>
\nCrocker Garden, Stanford Law School<\/em><\/p>\n

8:45am \u2013 10:40am\u00a0Breakout Session IV<\/strong>
\nClassroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/em><\/p>\n

10:40am \u2013 11:05am Break<\/strong>
\nCrocker Garden, Stanford Law School<\/em><\/p>\n

11:05am \u2013 1:00pm\u00a0Breakout Session V<\/strong>
\nClassroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/em><\/p>\n

1:00pm \u2013 2:00pm Lunch<\/strong>
\nPaul Brest Hall, Munger Graduate Residences<\/em><\/p>\n

2:00pm \u2013 3:30 pm Closing Plenary Session<\/strong>
\nPaul Brest Hall, Munger Graduate Residences<\/em><\/p>\n

3:30pm Closing Remarks<\/strong>
\nPaul Brest Hall, Munger Graduate Residences<\/em><\/p>\n

3:45pm Shuttle departs from Stanford Law School to Stanford Park Hotel<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

August 11, 2016<\/strong>
\nPlenary I<\/a>
\nBreakout Sessions\u00a0III<\/a><\/p>\n

August 12, 2016<\/strong>
\nPlenary II<\/a>
\nBreakout Sessions\u00a0IV |\u00a0<\/a>V<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

DAY ONE \u2013 AUGUST 11, 2016<\/h2>\n

<\/a>Opening Plenary Session<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Paul Brest Hall, Munger Graduate Residences<\/p>\n

Scarcity of Attention in a World without IP<\/em>
\nJake Linford<\/strong><\/p>\n

What\u2019s In vs. What\u2019s Out: How IP\u2019s Boundary Rules Shape Innovation<\/em>
\nMark McKenna & Christopher Sprigman<\/strong><\/p>\n

Patent Clutter<\/em>
\nJanet Freilich<\/strong><\/p>\n

What We Buy When We \u201cBuy Now\u201d<\/em>
\nAaron Perzanowski & Chris Hoofnagle<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a>Breakout Session I \u2013 Day One<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Classroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Room\u00a0180<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0280A<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0185<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0280B<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0190<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0290<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Big Data, Contracts, & Futurelaw<\/strong><\/td>\nCopyright: Music & Remixes<\/strong><\/td>\nInternational IP Institutions<\/strong><\/td>\nIP for Characters & Symbols<\/strong><\/td>\nPatent Damages<\/strong><\/td>\nPatent Disclosure<\/strong>
\n& Signaling<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
I Think, Therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Ryan Abbott<\/strong><\/td>\nAssessing France\u2019s Graduated Response Scheme Against Piracy & State Interventionism in the Marketplace for Copyrighted Content \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Nicholas Jondet<\/strong><\/td>\nAgainst IP<\/em>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0Dave Fagundes<\/strong><\/td>\nIs Copyright an Author\u2019s Right? An Authorship Perspective on Copyright Law \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Mira Sundara Rajan<\/strong><\/td>\nRemaining Differences in Patent Damages Calculation in Japan and the US \u2013\u00a0<\/em>C<\/strong>hristoph Rademacher<\/strong><\/td>\nPossession and Patent Prior Art \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Tim Holbrook<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Blockchains: Next Wave of Decentralization or the Rise of the Metered Internet \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Aaron Wright<\/strong><\/td>\nCopyrightability of Digital Remixes and the Right of Remixers \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Yahong Li<\/strong><\/td>\nDomestic Innovation and International Collaboration for Addressing Climate Change \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Joy Xiang<\/strong><\/td>\nWorks of Fiction: The Misconception of Literary Characters as Copyright Works \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Jani McCutcheon<\/strong><\/td>\n(Un)Reasonable Royalties \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Michael Risch<\/strong><\/td>\nBehavioral Claim Construction \u2013\u00a0<\/em>J<\/strong>eremy Bock<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Undercover Detective Looks at Data Breach Contract Clauses \u2013\u00a0Jill Bronfman<\/b><\/i><\/td>\n\u00a0The New Problem with Music \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Peter DiCola<\/b><\/td>\nWill WIPO Visually Impaired Treaty Help to End \u201cBook Famine\u201d for Visually Impaired People? \u00a0 \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Rami Olwan<\/strong><\/td>\nZombie Cinderella and the Undead Public Domain \u2013\u00a0Rebecca Curtin<\/strong><\/em><\/td>\nInnovation Factors for Reasonable Royalties<\/em>Ted Sichelman<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Predictive Power of Patents \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Sabrina Safrin<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Algorithmic Contracts \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Lauren Henry Scholz<\/strong><\/td>\nWho Killed the Radio Star? How Music Blanket Licenses Distort the Production of Creative Content \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Ariel Katz & Eden Sarid<\/strong><\/td>\nIntellectual Property Dispute Resolution Through Arbitration and Mediation<\/em>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0<\/em>Vandana Singh<\/strong>h<\/strong><\/td>\nTrademarks, Core Values and Cultural Leadership \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Deborah Gerhardt<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Information Forcing Dilemma in Patent Damages \u2013\u00a0<\/em>T.J. Chiang<\/strong><\/td>\nPatent Silences \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Dan Burk<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Racist Algorithm? \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Anupam Chander<\/strong><\/td>\nHow Law Defines Music \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Joseph Fishman<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Regime Shifting of IP Law-Making and Enforcement to Intl Investment Law \u2013\u00a0<\/i>Cynthia Ho & James Gathii<\/strong><\/td>\nIntellectual Property in Internet Folklore \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Cathay Smith<\/strong><\/td>\nRational Willfulness: Toward a New Standard for Enhanced Damages in Patent Law \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Dmitry Karshtedt<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Who Reads Patents? \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Lisa Larrimore Ouellette<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/a>Breakout Session II \u2013 Day One<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Classroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Room 190<\/td>\nRoom 185<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0280B<\/td>\nRoom 290<\/td>\nRoom 180<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0280A<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Copyright Doctrine<\/strong><\/td>\nGeography of Innovation<\/strong><\/td>\nIP & Cognitive Psychology<\/strong><\/td>\nPTO & Patent Data<\/strong><\/td>\nTrademarks, Advertising & Consumers<\/strong><\/td>\nTrade Secrets<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Copyright State of Mind \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Edward Lee<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0PR issues Related to U.S. Raising Protection to Firms in India \u2013\u00a0<\/em>M. Afzal Wani<\/strong><\/td>\nPatent Pacifism \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Clark Asay<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Procrastination in the Workplace: Evidence from U.S. Patent Examiners \u2013<\/em>Michael Frakes<\/strong>&\u00a0Melissa Wasserman<\/strong><\/td>\nRelying on\u00a0<\/em>Reputation \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Jim Gibson<\/strong><\/td>\nTop Secret(s) \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Derek Bambauer\u00a0<\/strong>&Simone Sepe<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Reforming Infringement \u2013\u00a0<\/i>Abraham Bell<\/strong>\u00a0&Gideon Parchomovsky<\/strong><\/td>\nGovernmentality and Innovation: The Role of Intellectual Property Foundation Law in Korea and Japan \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Hee Kyoung Spiritas Cho<\/strong><\/td>\nUncertainty Aversion and Intellectual Property \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Betsy Rosenblatt<\/strong><\/td>\nMeasuring the Mayo Effect \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Bernard Chao<\/strong><\/td>\nGoing Native:<\/em>\u00a0Can Consumers Recognize Native Advertising? Do They Care? \u2013\u00a0<\/em>David Hyman<\/strong>\u00a0&David Franklyn<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Trade Secret Precautions, Possession and Notice \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Deepa Varadarajan<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0Authorship and Audience Appeal \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Tim McFarlin<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Golden West: Influential Innovation Made in San Francisco as Seen in Patent Records \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Richard Gruner<\/strong><\/td>\nRisky IP \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Andres Sawicki<\/strong><\/td>\nCBA at the PTO \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Jonathan Masur<\/strong><\/td>\nNaming and (Re)Claiming \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Laura Heymann<\/strong><\/td>\nUnpacking Trade Secret Damages \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Elizabeth Rowe<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0Free as the Heir?: Contextualizing the Role of Copyright Successors \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Eva Subotnik<\/strong><\/td>\nA Spatial Critique of Intellectual Property Law and Policy \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Peter K. Yu<\/strong><\/td>\nImproving the Patent Application Process for Clearer Claim Scope \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Stephanie Plamondon Bair<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0The Surprising Resilience of the Patent System \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Mark Lemley<\/strong><\/td>\nWhy Does Trademark Law Protect the Strong More Than the Weak? \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Barton Beebe<\/strong>\u00a0&\u00a0Scott Hemphill<\/strong><\/td>\nToward a Federal Jurisprudence of Trade Secret Law \u2013\u00a0<\/em>S<\/strong>haron Sandeen\u00a0<\/strong>&Christopher Seaman<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0Leveraging Death: IP Estates and Shared Mourning \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Andrew Gilden<\/strong><\/td>\nPatent Tigers: The New Geography of Global Innovation \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Jonathan Barnett<\/strong><\/td>\nWhat Causes Polarization on IP Policy<\/em>? \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Maggie\u00a0<\/strong>Wittlin, Lisa Ouellette\u00a0<\/strong>&Gregory Mandel<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Do Trolls Acquire and Assert Valuable Patents? \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Andrew Torrance<\/strong>\u00a0&Jevin West<\/strong><\/td>\nBranded \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Irina Manta<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Defend Trade Secrets Act Isn\u2019t An \u201cIntellectual Property\u201d Law \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Eric Goldman<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/a>Breakout III \u2013 Day One<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Classroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Room\u00a0185<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0190<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0280A<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0290<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0180<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0280B<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cross-Border Infringement & Exhaustion<\/strong><\/td>\nCyberlaw & Intermediary Liability<\/strong><\/td>\nIP,\u00a0the Constitution & the Courts<\/strong><\/td>\nIP & Privacy<\/strong><\/td>\nPatent Pools & Standards<\/strong><\/td>\nUniversities,<\/strong>Grants & IP<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Rise of Constitutional Balancing in European Copyright Law \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Cyrill Rigamonti<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Applicable Law in Copyright Violation in Cyberspace: Need for Clarity \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Gurujit Singh<\/strong><\/td>\nLexmark and the Holding Dicta Distinction \u2013\u00a0Andrew Michaels<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Exploring Privacy as Commons \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Katherine Strandburg & Brett Frischmann<\/strong><\/td>\nSmartphones Industry and SEPs in India \u2013\u00a0Sunita Tripathy<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Student Patent Rights \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Jessica Hudak<\/strong>\u00a0& Lisa Ouellette<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Principles Void Regarding the Exhaustion Theory within the Andean Community \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Carlos Uribe\u00a0<\/strong>&\u00a0Juan Contreras<\/strong><\/td>\nTesting the Limits of the Section 230 IP Exemption \u2013\u00a0<\/em>C<\/strong>athy Gellis<\/strong><\/td>\nA Problem of Subject Matter: Patent Demand Letters and the Federal Circuit\u2019s Jurisdiction \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Charles Duan\u00a0<\/strong>&\u00a0Kerry Sheehan<\/strong><\/td>\nCreativity and Notice On the Ground \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Ari Waldman<\/strong><\/td>\nDecoding Evolving Nexus Between Standard-Essential Patents (SEPs) and Competition Law in India \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Vinay Kumar Singh\u00a0<\/strong>&Arundhati Nayudu<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Disclosing Data Enabled Research: Intellectual Property Policy for Publishers, Technology Transfer Offices, and Librarians \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Victoria Stodden<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Ghosts of Patent Exhaustion Past \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Amelia Smith Rinehart<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0DMCA+ Enforcement in the New gTLDs \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Annemarie Bridy<\/strong><\/td>\nEstablished Rights, the Takings Clause, and Patent Law \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Jason Rantanen<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Private, Public, Public Domain : How the Judicial Decisions Shaping the Perceptions of Facebook Users in Taiwan \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Yachi Chiang<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Nondiscrimination element within FRAND royalty terms \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Jeffery Atik<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0A Market Test for Bayh-Dole Patent<\/em>s \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Ian Ayres\u00a0<\/strong>&\u00a0Lisa Ouellette<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Patent Damages Without Borders \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Sapna Kumar<\/strong><\/td>\nThe World Intermediary Liability Map: Charting the Online Intermediary Liability Conundrum \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Giancarlo Frosio<\/strong><\/td>\nA Free Speech Right to Trademark Protection? \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Lisa Ramsey<\/strong><\/td>\nConfidentiality Creep and Dual Use Secrecy: The Professions in an Age of Information Capture \u2013\u00a0<\/em>David Levine<\/strong><\/td>\nMeasuring the Costs and Benefits of Patent Pools \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Michael Mattioli<\/strong>\u00a0&Robert Merges<\/strong><\/td>\nCancer\u2019s IP \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Jake Sherkow<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

DAY TWO \u2013 AUGUST 12, 2016<\/h2>\n

<\/a>Breakout Session IV \u2013 Day Two<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Classroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Room 280A<\/td>\nRoom 190<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0290<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0280B<\/td>\nRoom 180<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Commons<\/strong><\/td>\nEmpirical Copyright<\/strong><\/td>\nInnovation & Non-Patent Incentives<\/strong><\/td>\nIP Theory<\/strong><\/td>\nPatents & Post-Grant Review<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Licensing Open Government Data \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Jyh-An Lee<\/strong><\/td>\nCopyright Misuse:\u00a0 A Taxonomy \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Ann Bartow<\/strong><\/td>\nInnovation Policy Pluralism \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Daniel Hemel\u00a0<\/strong>&\u00a0Lisa Ouellette<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0The Hidden Cost of Free Patents \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Liza Vertinsky<\/strong><\/td>\nQuick Decisions in Patent Cases \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Paul Gugliuzza<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Romance of the Commons \u2013\u00a0<\/em>S<\/strong>ean Pager<\/strong><\/td>\nEmpirical Studies Of Copyright Litigation, A Review \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Matthew Sag<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Unpatentable Microbiome \u2013<\/em>Rachel Sachs<\/strong><\/td>\nMore Property-Like than Property: The Prevalence of Property Rules in IP Remedial Schemes \u2013\u00a0<\/em>B.J. Ard<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0The Non-Doctrine of Redundancy \u2013<\/em>S<\/strong>aurabh Vishnubhakat<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3d Bioprinting Patent Boundaries \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Tabrez Ebrahim<\/strong><\/td>\nAn Empirical Study of Copyright Statutory Damages \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Ben Depoorter<\/strong><\/td>\nRecalibrating Incentives for Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Yaniv Heled, Liza Vertinsky\u00a0<\/strong>&\u00a0Cass Brewer<\/strong><\/td>\nIndiscrete Property \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Michael Burstein<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Pay for Go-Away: Reverse Payment Settlements and Holdup Under PTAB \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Erik Hovenkamp<\/strong>\u00a0&Jorge Lemus<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Governing Medical Commons \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Mike Madison, Brett Frischmann\u00a0<\/strong>&Katherine Strandburg<\/strong><\/td>\nNo Honor Among Thieves? Software Piracy Rates and Charismatic Appeal \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Andrew Moshirnia<\/strong><\/td>\nCan CED Resolve the Catch-22 for Molecular Diagnostics? \u2013<\/em>Rebecca Eisenberg<\/strong><\/td>\nWhy Authors Create? A Law and Economic Perspective \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Jiarui Liu<\/strong><\/td>\nPost-Grant Review and Hatch-Waxman: Competition Among Tribunals, Competition Among Drug Manufacturers\u00a0<\/i>\u2013\u00a0<\/em>Jennifer E. Sturiale<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0The North American Mitochondrial Disease Consortium:\u00a0 An Emerging Knowledge Commons \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Brett Frischmann\u00a0<\/strong>&Katherine Strandburg<\/strong><\/td>\nUndetected Conflict-Of-Laws Problems in Cross-Border Online Copyright Infringement Cases \u2013<\/em>Marketa Trimble<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Patent Failures on Life Science Frontiers \u2013<\/em>Nicholson Price<\/strong>\u00a0&Timo Minssen<\/strong><\/td>\nRegulatory Property: The New IP \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Robin Feldman<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0IPR\u2019ed Patents 1.0: Low Quality or High Value?-\u00a0<\/em>Shawn Miller, Brian Love\u00a0<\/strong>&Shawn Ambwani<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

<\/a>Breakout Session V \u2013 Day Two<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Classroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Room 185<\/td>\nRoom 280A<\/td>\nRoom280B<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0190<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0180<\/td>\nRoom\u00a0290<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Comparative IP<\/strong><\/td>\nCopyright & Government<\/strong><\/td>\nInnovation &\u00a0<\/strong>Global Health<\/strong><\/td>\nIP Theory II Functionality & Design<\/strong><\/td>\nPatent Assertion\u00a0<\/strong>& Litigation<\/strong><\/td>\nPatent Doctrine (& Copyrightable) Subject Matter<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bridging the Gap between IP Rights & Indigenous Innovators & Inventors in Developing Countries \u2013\u00a0<\/em>John John Uket<\/strong><\/td>\nPublic Sculpture and Moral Right \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Deming Liu<\/strong><\/td>\nBio-piracy related to traditional medicine and pharmaceutical sector: A Legal Perspective \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Zubair Ahmed Khan<\/strong><\/td>\nInfringing Algorithms \u2013\u00a0<\/em>F<\/strong>elix Wu<\/strong><\/td>\nOpening Pandora\u2019s Box: Analyzing the Complexity of U.S. Patent Litigation \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Jonathan Ashtor<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Are Engineered Genetic Sequences Copyrightable?: The U.S. Copyright Office Addresses a Matter of First Impression \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Chris Holman, Claes Gustafsson\u00a0<\/strong>&\u00a0Andrew Torrance<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Convergence between Chinese Entertainment Law and Hollywood Practice \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Seagull Song<\/strong><\/td>\nCompelled Viewing: Copyright Exceptions for Public Art \u2013<\/em>Marta Iljadica<\/strong><\/td>\nKorea\u2019s 1st Year Experience with Hatch-Waxman \u2013<\/em>Won Bok Lee<\/strong><\/td>\nFunctional Compilation<\/em>s \u2013<\/em>Pamela Samuelson<\/strong><\/td>\nTeaching Patents As Real Options \u2013<\/em>Andrew Chin<\/strong><\/td>\nData-Generated Patents, Eligibility, & Information Flow \u2013<\/em>Brenda Simon<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Best Practice for Patent Judiciary: Comparative Law Perspective \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Toshiko Takenaka<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Edicts of Government: Copyright in State Legal Materials \u2013<\/em>D.R. Jones<\/strong><\/td>\nArt. 53 (a) of the European Patent Convention: an Interaction of Two Traditions \u2013\u00a0Jurgita Randakeviciute<\/strong><\/td>\nScreening Functionality in Intellectual Property Law \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Christopher Buccafusco\u00a0<\/strong>&Mark Lemley<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\nInventive Application, Legal Transplants, Pre-Funk, and Judicial Policymaking \u2013<\/em>Josh Sarnoff<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
What Explains Intellectual Property Use in Chile and Does it Make a Difference? \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Christian Helmers, Bronwyn Hall\u00a0<\/strong>&\u00a0Carsten Fink<\/strong><\/td>\nEuropean and American models of the\u00a0Use of Orphan Works \u2013 Is There a Need for Solutions at the International Level? \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Joanna Banasiuk<\/strong><\/td>\nFast-tracking Biopharma Innovation: IP-related Lessons from the Ebola Outbreak Response \u2013<\/em>Ana Santos Rutschman<\/strong><\/td>\nClaiming Design \u2013<\/em>Jeanne Fromer\u00a0<\/strong>&\u00a0Mark McKenna<\/strong><\/td>\nLessons Learned from Concept to Growth of the License On Transfer (LOT) Network \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Eric Schulman<\/b><\/td>\nThe Impact on Investment in Research and Development of the Supreme Court\u2019s Eligibility Decisions \u2013\u00a0<\/em>David Taylor<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
The Customary and Statutory Patent Systems in\u00a0the Venetian Republic Between the 15th and 18th Centuries \u2013<\/em>Stefania Fusco<\/strong><\/td>\nHow Social Publishing Can End Book Hunger \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Lea Shaver<\/strong><\/td>\nA Prescription for Excessive Drug Pricing: Leveraging Patent Use for Health \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Amy Kapczynski<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Copyright as Tortious Interference \u2013<\/em>Shyam Balganesh<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Effect of Fee Shifting on IP Litigation: Evidence from a Court Reform in the UK \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Brian Love, Christian Helmers, Yassine Lefouili\u00a0<\/strong>&\u00a0Luke McDonagh<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Fallacy of Mayo\u2019s Double Invention Requirement for Patenting of Scientific Discoveries \u2013\u00a0<\/em>Peter Menell\u00a0<\/strong>&Jeffrey Lefstin<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/a>Closing Plenary Session<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Paul Brest Hall, Munger Graduate Residences<\/p>\n

The Nature of Sequential Innovation<\/em>
\nChristopher Sprigman, Christopher Buccafusco & Stefan Bechtold<\/strong><\/p>\n

Copyright and Distributive Justice<\/em>
\nJustin Hughes & Robert Merges<\/strong><\/p>\n

IP, Privacy\u00a0<\/em>Harms\u00a0and other Fundamental Values<\/em>
\nJessica Silbey<\/strong><\/p>\n

What\u2019s the Harm of Trademark Infringement?<\/em>
\nRebecca Tushnet<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

IMPORTANT DATES May 15, 2016: Deadline for Submission of Requests to Present and Requests to Attend August 8, 2016: Deadline for Submission of Paper Drafts and\/or Presentation Slides CONFERENCE SCHEDULE\u00a0(UPDATED AUGUST 9TH) AUGUST 10, 2016 7:00pm \u2013 8:30pm Informal Opening Reception The Stanford Room, Stanford Park Hotel   DAY ONE \u2013 AUGUST 11, 2016 7:45am […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-25","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nImportant Dates & Schedule\u00a0 - Intellectual Property Scholars Conference 2016<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0 - Intellectual Property Scholars Conference 2016\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"IMPORTANT DATES May 15, 2016: Deadline for Submission of Requests to Present and Requests to Attend August 8, 2016: Deadline for Submission of Paper Drafts and\/or Presentation Slides CONFERENCE SCHEDULE\u00a0(UPDATED AUGUST 9TH) AUGUST 10, 2016 7:00pm \u2013 8:30pm Informal Opening Reception The Stanford Room, Stanford Park Hotel   DAY ONE \u2013 AUGUST 11, 2016 7:45am […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Intellectual Property Scholars Conference 2016\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-07T19:46:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/\",\"name\":\"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0 - Intellectual Property Scholars Conference 2016\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-09-07T19:00:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-07T19:46:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/\",\"name\":\"Intellectual Property Scholars Conference 2016\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0 - Intellectual Property Scholars Conference 2016","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0 - Intellectual Property Scholars Conference 2016","og_description":"IMPORTANT DATES May 15, 2016: Deadline for Submission of Requests to Present and Requests to Attend August 8, 2016: Deadline for Submission of Paper Drafts and\/or Presentation Slides CONFERENCE SCHEDULE\u00a0(UPDATED AUGUST 9TH) AUGUST 10, 2016 7:00pm \u2013 8:30pm Informal Opening Reception The Stanford Room, Stanford Park Hotel   DAY ONE \u2013 AUGUST 11, 2016 7:45am […]","og_url":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/","og_site_name":"Intellectual Property Scholars Conference 2016","article_modified_time":"2016-09-07T19:46:45+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/","url":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/","name":"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0 - Intellectual Property Scholars Conference 2016","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-09-07T19:00:33+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-07T19:46:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/important-dates-schedule\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/#website","url":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/","name":"Intellectual Property Scholars Conference 2016","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/25","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/25\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2016\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}