{"id":25,"date":"2016-09-07T19:00:33","date_gmt":"2016-09-07T19:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/?page_id=25"},"modified":"2022-08-11T09:28:40","modified_gmt":"2022-08-11T16:28:40","slug":"important-dates-schedule","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/important-dates-schedule\/","title":{"rendered":"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

IMPORTANT DATES<\/h2>\n

May 15, 2022:<\/strong>\u00a0 Deadline for Submission of Requests to Present (with title and abstract) and Request to Attend<\/p>\n

June 1, 2022:<\/strong> Notification of Accepted Presentations<\/p>\n

August 1, 2022:<\/strong> Deadline for Submission of Paper Drafts<\/p>\n

\n

SCHEDULE*<\/h3>\n

Subject to change<\/em><\/p>\n

Wednesday, August 10, 2022<\/h2>\n

6:00 PM PST – Shuttle begins service between the Westin Palo Alto and Stanford Law School<\/strong>
\n* The shuttle loop between the Westin Palo Alto and Stanford Law School until 9:00 PM<\/em><\/p>\n

6:00 PM PST – COVID-19 Check-in Begins<\/strong>
\nPaul Brest Hall, Munger Complex<\/p>\n

7:00 PM – 8:30 PM PST – Informal Opening Reception
\n<\/strong>Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

Day 1: Thursday, August 11, 2022<\/h2>\n

7:00 AM PST – Shuttle departs from the Westin Palo Alto to Stanford Law School
\n<\/strong>* The shuttle will loop between the Westin Palo Alto to Stanford Law School until 9:00 AM PST.<\/strong>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

7:45 AM – 8:50 AM PST – Registration, COVID-19 Check-in & Breakfast
\n<\/strong>Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex<\/p>\n

8:50 AM – 9:00 AM PST – Welcome & Opening Remarks
\n<\/strong>Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

9:00 AM – 10:50 AM PST – Opening Plenary Session: Under-Represented Groups in the IP System
\n<\/strong>Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  • Representation of Female Inventors on Patent Teams<\/strong>
    \nJordi Goodman<\/li>\n
  • Curating Black Music: Copyright, Ownership & Commodification<\/strong>
    \nOlufunmilayo Arewa<\/li>\n
  • The Gender Gap in Academic Patenting<\/strong>
    \nMiriam Marcowitz-Bitton, Michael Schuster, and Deborah R. Gerhardt<\/li>\n
  • Computer Software Patents and the Gendered View of Computer Programming as Labor or Innovation<\/strong>
    \nNina Srejovic<\/li>\n
  • The Innovation Glass Ceiling: How Women are Penalized for Boundary Spanning Research<\/strong>
    \nRyan Whalen, Tara Sowrirajan, Sourav Medya, and Brian Uzzi<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

    10:50 AM PST – 11:10 AM PST – Break
    \n<\/strong>Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
    \n<\/strong><\/p>\n

    11:10 AM – 1:00 PM PST – Breakout Session I \u2013 Day One
    \n<\/strong>Paul Brest Hall (PBH) and Classroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Room 90<\/strong><\/td>\nPBH West<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 85<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 180<\/strong><\/td>\nPBH East<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 95<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Copyright: Music & Authorship<\/strong><\/td>\nCopying & Security<\/strong><\/td>\nGlobal Competition & Exchange<\/strong><\/td>\nIP & Pandemic Preparedness<\/strong><\/td>\nPatentability Requirements<\/strong><\/td>\nTrade Secrets<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Co-authorship in Comparative Perspective: Intentions, Relations, and Implications\u00a0 – Carys Craig, Luke McDonagh, and Daniele Simone<\/strong><\/td>\nMinding Copying-in-Fact’s Evidentiary Gaps – Joseph Scott Miller<\/strong>
    \n<\/em>
    \n<\/em><\/td>\n    		Privacy and\/or Trade – Anupam Chander and Paul Schwartz<\/strong><\/td>\nThe False Promise of Price Controls on Drug Patents: A Legal and Policy Analysis of the Bayh-Dole Act and \u00a7 1498 – Adam Mossoff<\/strong><\/td>\nWhat\u2019s the Use of Patent Utility? – David Olson<\/strong><\/td>\nShifting from Patents to Trade Secrets – Michael Risch<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Measuring the Harms of Unauthorized Campaign Music – Jake Linford and Aaron Perzanowski<\/strong><\/td>\nRight Hand, Meet Left Hand: How Copyright Law Undermines Cybersecurity – Cathy Gellis<\/strong><\/td>\nProcurement Institutions and Essential Drug Supply in Low and Middle-Income Countries – Lucy Xiaolu Wang and Nahim Bin Zahur<\/strong><\/td>\nVaccines\u2019 Intellectual Property and Access to Health – Ana Alba-Betancourt, Laura Vidal, and Luna Mancini \u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Antibody Paradox – Mark Lemley and Jake Sherkow<\/strong><\/td>\nCuriosities of Standing in Trade Secret Law – Charles Tait Graves<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Copyright and Nashville Songwriters: A Qualitative Study –\u00a0 Joseph Fishman<\/strong><\/td>\nAn Empirical Study of the DMCA’s Anti-Circumvention Provisions – Clark Asay<\/strong><\/td>\nU.S. Law of Geographical Trademarks, \u201cGoogle Effects,\u201d Historical Developments, and U.S. International Obligations: Proposal for Changes to the Lanham Act – Marketa Trimble<\/strong><\/td>\nCentralizing Pharmaceutical Innovation – Sapna Kumar<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Substantial Role of Patent (In)Eligibility in Promoting Artificial Intelligence Innovation – Nikola Datzov<\/strong><\/td>\nPublicizing Corporate Secrets – Christopher Morten<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Abuse of Copyright: Intervention into Racial Inequity – Margaret Chon and Olufunmilayo Arewa<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\nWhat the Mexican Supreme Court Can Learn from the CJEU\u2019s Constitutionality Decision of the New EU\u2019s Notice-and-Staydown System – Cesar Ramirez -Montes<\/strong><\/td>\nTransnational Competition: From Enforcement of \u00a0Foreign Unfair Competition Judgments to
    \nGlobal Trademarks\u00a0– Naama Daniel<\/strong><\/td>\n    		Deferring Intellectual Property Rights in Pandemic Times – Peter Yu<\/strong><\/td>\nAssessing Evidence of Secondary Consideration – Jason Reincke<\/strong><\/td>\nA Psychology of Trade Secrecy – Jeanne Fromer<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    <\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nAnti-Intellectualism in American Intellectual Property – Sepehr Shahshahani<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Employee\u2019s Right to Learn – Sharon K. Sandeen<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    1:00 PM PST – 2:00 PM PST – Lunch
    \n<\/strong>Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
    \n<\/strong><\/p>\n

    2:00 PM – 3:50 PM PST – Breakout Session 2 \u2013 Day One
    \n<\/strong>Paul Brest Hall (PBH) and Classroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Room 90<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 85<\/strong><\/td>\nPBH East<\/strong><\/td>\nPBH West<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 180<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 95<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Copyright: Fair Use<\/strong><\/td>\nInternational IP<\/strong><\/td>\nIP Examination & Applications<\/strong><\/td>\nIP, Competition, & Market Power<\/strong><\/td>\nKnowledge Transfer after COVID<\/strong><\/td>\nTrademarks and Branding<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Unfair Use – Becky Chambers<\/strong><\/td>\nInfringement as Artefact: The Curious Case of Paramount Pictures v Rup Kamal Chitra<\/em> – Arpan Banerjee<\/strong><\/td>\nInvestigating Patent Examination Quality – Jonathan H. Ashtor<\/strong><\/td>\nMandatory Infringement – Charles Duan<\/strong><\/td>\nCompelling Trade Secret Transfers – Dave Levine and Josh Sarnoff<\/strong><\/td>\nSound Marks – Deborah R. Gerhardt and Jon J. Lee<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Of Free and Fair Use – Ben Depoorter and Gideon Parchomovsky<\/strong><\/td>\nRevisiting Section 3(d): Can you Patent Incremental Innovation in India? – Gargi Chakrabarti and Lopamudra Dutta<\/strong><\/p>\n

    (ZOOM)<\/td>\n

    		Deadlines versus Continuous Incentives: Evidence from the Patent Office – Melissa Wasserman and Michael Frakes<\/strong><\/td>\nNoisy Patent Signals – Greg Reilly<\/strong><\/td>\nEmergency Accessibility and Intellectual Property Rights: A Trenchant Study of Monopoly Medicine and Public Health Negotiation – Gayathri Venugopal<\/strong><\/p>\n

    (ZOOM)<\/td>\n

    		Trademark Free Riders – Michael Grynberg<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Transforming Fairness: Recent Cases, the Public Interest, and the Fairness Factors – Lisa Macklem<\/strong><\/td>\nBalancing Intellectual Property Rights and Privacy Rights: Comparative Analysis of European Union,
    \nUnited States and Russian Legislation – Elena Beier<\/strong><\/td>\n    		Unpacking Provisional Patent Applications – Neel Sukhatme, Alexander Giczy, and Andrew Toole<\/strong><\/td>\nGendering Antitrust – Jennifer Sturiale<\/strong><\/td>\nAccess to Undisclosed Know-how – Joy Xiang<\/strong><\/td>\nA Consumer’s Real Interest in Trademark Registration – Rebecca Curtin<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Fair Use After Google v. Oracle – Michael Carroll and Peter Jaszi<\/strong><\/td>\nDoes the EU Market Need an eBay-like Case? Evidence Against Granting Automatic Preliminary Injunctions in Europe – Stefania Fusco and Valerio Sterzi<\/strong><\/p>\n

    (ZOOM)<\/td>\n

    		Seeing Innovation Differently: Scope and Meaning of Divergences in Examiner and Applicant Patent Citations – Richard Gruner<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Emperor’s New Copyright – Kristelia Garc\u00eda<\/strong><\/td>\nMultinational Bounded Entities and International Technology Transfer – Peter Lee<\/strong><\/td>\nSocial Uses of TM – Stephanie Plamondon Bair, Clark Asay, and LaReina Hingson<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    <\/td>\n<\/td>\nCopyright’s Examiners – Zahr K. Said<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    3:50 PM PST – 4:10 PM PST – Break
    \n<\/strong>Cooley Courtyard, Stanford Law School<\/p>\n

    4:10 PM – 6:00 PM PST – Breakout Session 3 \u2013 Day One
    \n<\/strong>Paul Brest Hall (PBH) and Classroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Room 90<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 95<\/strong><\/td>\nPBH West<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 85<\/strong><\/td>\nPBH East<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 180<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Creation Ownership<\/strong><\/td>\nIP & Tech in Everyday Life<\/strong><\/td>\nIP Standards<\/strong><\/td>\nLanguage, Speech, & IP<\/strong><\/td>\nPatent Litigation<\/strong><\/td>\nPharma & Medical Innovations<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Measuring the Inventor’s Contribution\u00a0 – Chris Storm<\/strong><\/td>\nIntangible: How Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks Shape Our Lives, from Startups to Drugs to Taylor Swift and Why Recipe Blogs Are So Darn Long – Christa Laser<\/strong><\/td>\nFRAND Arbitration Will Destroy FRAND – Barbara Lauriat<\/strong><\/td>\nWhat Is the Relationship Between Language and Thought?: Linguistic Relativity and Its Implications for Section 230 and Copyright – Christopher S. Yoo<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Federal Circuit\u2019s Experimental Prism – Jeremy Bock<\/strong><\/td>\nReframing Pharma – Emily Michiko Morris<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    There\u2019s No Such Thing as Independent Creation, and It\u2019s a Good Thing Too – Christopher Buccafusco<\/strong><\/td>\nIntellectual Property Is Theft! – Madhavi Sunder<\/strong><\/td>\nReviewing a Sense of Growing International Divergence in Standard-Essential Patents Enforcement – Christoph Rademacher<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Right to Speak a Brand: Rethinking the Interaction Between Trademarks and Speech in the Age of Expressive Branding – Alvaro Fernandez-Mora<\/strong><\/td>\nReal-World Prior Art – Jonathan Masur and Lisa Ouellette<\/strong><\/td>\nIntellectual Property and Assisted Reproductive Technology – Past, Present and Future – Jorge Contreras, David Cyranoski, and Victoria Carrington<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \n

    The Neglected Role of the Family in Copyright – Tal Itkin<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		Unwired: Gaining Control over Addictive Technologies – Gaia Bernstein<\/strong><\/td>\nSEP Licensing in the Automotive Sector: The New Technological Battleground – Manveen Singh<\/strong><\/td>\nTrademarks, Free Speech, and Inherently Valuable Expression – Lisa Ramsey<\/strong><\/td>\nHolistic Claim Construction in District Courts – Lidiya Mishchenko<\/strong><\/td>\nRethinking the Role of Innovation at FDA – Nicholson Price, Rachel Sachs, and Patricia Zettler<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    The Revolution Has Arrived: AI Authorship and Copyright Law – Ryan Abbott and Elizabeth Shubov<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/td>\nJudicial Dialogue and the Patent System – Karen Walsh<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Extended Self: A Framework for Information Rights – Mala Chatterjee<\/strong><\/td>\nPluralizing the PHOSITA in Patent Law – Lucas Osborn<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    <\/td>\n<\/td>\nQuantum Standards Development Organizations & Their Patent Policies – Tabrez Ebrahim<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    6:00 PM PST – 8:00 PM PST – Reception and Dinner
    \n<\/strong>Paul Brest Hall, Munger Graduate Complex<\/p>\n

    6:00 PM PST – 9:00 PM PST – Shuttle departs from the Westin Palo Alto to Stanford Law School<\/strong><\/div>\n
    * The shuttle will loop between the Westin Palo Alto to Stanford Law School until 9:00 PM.\u00a0<\/em><\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n
    \n
    \n<\/div>\n

    Day 2: Friday, August 12, 2022<\/h2>\n

    7:00 AM PST – Shuttle departs from the Westin Palo Alto to Stanford Law School
    \n<\/strong>* The shuttle will loop between the Westin Palo Alto to Stanford Law School until 9:00 AM<\/strong>.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

    7:45 AM – 8:50 AM PST – Registration, COVID-19 Check-in, and Breakfast
    \n<\/strong>Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex<\/p>\n

    8:50 AM \u2013 10:40 AM PST – Breakout Session 4 \u2013 Day Two
    \n<\/strong>Paul Brest Hall (PBH) and Classroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    PBH West<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 180<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 85<\/strong><\/td>\nPBH East<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 95<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 90<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Design & Digital Goods<\/strong><\/td>\nEmpirical IP<\/strong><\/td>\nIP & Administrative Agencies<\/strong><\/td>\nIP Considerations in Bio<\/strong><\/td>\nIP, AI, & Data<\/strong><\/td>\nScience & Technology Policy<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    A Theory of Legal Protection for Industrial Design – Christopher Sprigman and Jeanne C. Fromer<\/strong><\/td>\nDo Secondary Patents Affect Innovation? Evidence from a \u201cCounterfactual\u201d Orange Book – Maya Durvasula and Gideon Moore<\/strong><\/td>\nBalancing the Scales? The Impact of Discretionary Denials on Patent Assertion and Defense – Katelyn Chouteau Meylor, Alexander Evelson, Gabriel Faria Bernardes, Kimberly Ann Heng, Erich Remiker, Nik Shiva, VinhHuy Tran Le, and Shawn Miller<\/strong><\/td>\nA Root Cause Analysis of American Biological Patent Thickets – Bernard Chao and Rachel Moodie<\/strong><\/td>\nResolving Online Content Infringement Disputes with the Use of AI Technology – Faye Wang<\/strong><\/p>\n

    (ZOOM)<\/td>\n

    		The Department of Science and Technology – Andres Sawicki<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Trademark Law in the Metaverse – Mark McKenna<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Federal Circuit Dataset Project – Jason Rantanen<\/strong><\/td>\nPatent Timing – Sarah R. Wasserman Rajec<\/strong><\/td>\nMarching Backward to Move Forward: Speeding Emergency Access to Patented Drugs under the Bayh-Dole Act – Gary Pulsinelli<\/strong><\/td>\nAppropriation of Data-driven Persona –
    \nZahra Takhshid<\/strong><\/td>\n    		Property and Power on the Endless Frontier – Dan Traficonte<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Synthetic Data and Rights-respecting Innovation – Orla Lynskey and Michal Gal<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Impact of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Foreign Applicants\u2019 Citation Behaviors: Evidence from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan – Thomas Y. Lu and Wei-Cheng Chen<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Coming Copyright Judge Crisis – Saurabh Vishnubhakat and Dave Fagundes<\/strong><\/td>\nVenturing Into Health – Rachel Sachs<\/strong><\/td>\n\n

    The Right of Publicity: A New Framework for Regulating Facial Recognition – Jason Schultz<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

    		The Nigerian Chemical Tank Farms and Chemprenuers: Domesticating Indigenous Innovation in Developing Countries – JohnJohn Uket, Mfon Eneobong, Jacob Bassey and Monilola Udoh<\/strong><\/p>\n

    (ZOOM)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

    Intellectual Property and the Manufacture of Aura – Stefan Bechtold and Chris Sprigman<\/strong><\/td>\nPreliminary Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases: Repairing Irreparable Harm – John C. Jarosz, Jorge Contreras, Robert Vigil, and Ivan Maryanchyk<\/strong><\/td>\nAdministering Copyright – Zvi S. Rosen<\/strong><\/td>\nValuing Medical Innovation – Lisa Ouellette and Daniel Hemel<\/strong><\/td>\nAI as Inventor in the Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence –\u00a0Chris Mammen<\/strong><\/td>\nRedefining Progress as Diversity in Inventorship – Colleen Chien<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    10:40 AM \u2013 11:00 AM PST – Break<\/strong>
    \nCooley Courtyard, Stanford Law School<\/p>\n

    11:00 AM \u2013 12:50 PM PST – Breakout Session 5 \u2013 Day Two<\/strong>
    \nPaul Brest Hall (PBH) and Classroom Building, Stanford Law School<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Room 90<\/strong><\/td>\nPBH East<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 85<\/strong><\/td>\nPBH West<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 95<\/strong><\/td>\nRoom 180<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    IP & Governance Reform<\/strong><\/td>\nIP in NFTs & Patent Reform<\/strong><\/td>\nIP Strategies<\/strong><\/td>\nIP Theory & History<\/strong><\/td>\nMorality, Social Constructs, & Creation<\/strong><\/td>\nPatent Venue Shopping & Crowding<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Externalities, Scarcity and Abundance – Brett Frischmann and Giovanni B. Ramello<\/strong><\/td>\nGoverning NFT Transactions: An Intellectual Property-Oriented Model – Jyh-An Lee and Runhua Wang<\/strong><\/td>\nRevealing When Companies Choose Inside Counsel: A Case Study from Patents – David Schwartz and Christopher Cotropia<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Pleasures of IP – David A. Simon and Patrick Goold<\/strong><\/td>\nPatents in Action – Dan L Burk<\/strong><\/p>\n

    (ZOOM)<\/td>\n

    		An Empirical Examination of Venue in Patent Cases – Amy Semet<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Copyright, Uniqueness, Norms, and Talent: How Drag Queens Govern Intellectual Property Without Law – Eden Sarid<\/strong><\/td>\nFixing ReDigi: NFT Tethered Sound Recordings – Zachary L. Catanzaro<\/strong><\/td>\nReserving the Right to Invent – Lorelei Ritchie<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Macroeconomics of Intellectual Property – Eric E Johnson<\/strong><\/td>\nContextual Disclosure for Patenting AI Inventions – Phoebe Li<\/strong><\/td>\nWelcome to Waco! The Impact of Judge-Shopping on Litigation – Brian J. Love and Christian Helmers<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Reciprocity in Knowledge Governance Policy – Jeremy Sheff<\/strong><\/td>\nNoticing Patents – Jay Thomas<\/strong><\/td>\nMy Fair Lady: Revisiting Brand Name Change Through a Strategic Lens – Mayuree Sengupta\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

    (ZOOM)<\/td>\n

    		Copyright Rebooted – Oren Bracha and Talha Syed<\/strong><\/td>\nLoyalties v. Royalties –\u00a0 Sarah Polcz<\/strong><\/td>\nWhy Do Judges Compete for (Patent) Cases?\u00a0 –Paul Gugliuzza and Jonas Anderson<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    \u201cLitigating\u201d Inventor Business Form – Shawn Miller<\/strong><\/td>\nEvaluating Patent Reform Instruments – Michael Meurer, Janet Freilich, Mark Schankerman, and Florian Schuett<\/strong><\/td>\nThe Conduit Theory of Secondary Liability – TJ Chiang<\/strong><\/td>\nLearned Hand’s Copyright Law – Shyam Balganesh<\/strong><\/td>\nBased on a True Story: Life Story Rights, Modularity, and the Propertization of the Self – Dave Fagundes and Jorge Contreras<\/strong><\/td>\nInterdisciplinary Inventions and Eligibility: Artificial Intelligence Patentability in Life Sciences and Information Technology – Samantha Zyontz<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    <\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nPrivate Law Theory: Assimilating IP Into the New Private Law – Robert MergesA Matter of Facts: The Evolution of the Copyright Fact-Exclusion and its Implications for Disinformation
    \nand Democracy – Jessica Silbey<\/strong><\/td>\n    		Forum Crowding\u00a0 – Tejas Narechania, Tian Kisch, and Delia Scoville<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

    12:50 PM – 1:50 PM PST – Lunch
    \n<\/strong>Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex<\/p>\n

    1:50 PM \u2013 3:40 PM PST – Closing Plenary Session: IP in the Courts<\/strong>
    \nPaul Brest Hall, Munger Complex<\/p>\n

      \n
    • Warner Bros. v. Fans: Lessons from Litigation<\/strong>
      \nBetsy Rosenblatt<\/li>\n
    • Automating the Uncertain Judge<\/strong>
      \nCourtney M. Cox<\/li>\n
    • Schedule A Defendants<\/strong>
      \nEric Goldman<\/li>\n
    • The Class Action as Licensing and Reform Device<\/strong>
      \nXiyin Tang<\/li>\n
    • The Solicitor General’s Mixed Record of Success Before the Supreme Court in Copyright Cases<\/strong>
      \nPam Samuelson<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

      3:40 PM PST – Closing Remarks<\/strong>
      \nPaul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
      \n<\/strong><\/p>\n

      2:00 PM PST – Shuttle begins service between the Stanford Law School and the Westin Palo Alto
      \n<\/strong>* The shuttle will loop between the Westin Palo Alto to Stanford Law School until 4:00 PM.\u00a0<\/em>
      \n<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      IMPORTANT DATES May 15, 2022:\u00a0 Deadline for Submission of Requests to Present (with title and abstract) and Request to Attend June 1, 2022: Notification of Accepted Presentations August 1, 2022: Deadline for Submission of Paper Drafts SCHEDULE* Subject to change Wednesday, August 10, 2022 6:00 PM PST – Shuttle begins service between the Westin Palo […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-25","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\nImportant Dates & Schedule\u00a0 - 2022 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/important-dates-schedule\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0 - 2022 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"IMPORTANT DATES May 15, 2022:\u00a0 Deadline for Submission of Requests to Present (with title and abstract) and Request to Attend June 1, 2022: Notification of Accepted Presentations August 1, 2022: Deadline for Submission of Paper Drafts SCHEDULE* Subject to change Wednesday, August 10, 2022 6:00 PM PST – Shuttle begins service between the Westin Palo […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/important-dates-schedule\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"2022 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-08-11T16:28:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\\\/ipsc2022\\\/important-dates-schedule\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\\\/ipsc2022\\\/important-dates-schedule\\\/\",\"name\":\"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0 - 2022 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\\\/ipsc2022\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-09-07T19:00:33+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-08-11T16:28:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\\\/ipsc2022\\\/important-dates-schedule\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\\\/ipsc2022\\\/important-dates-schedule\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\\\/ipsc2022\\\/important-dates-schedule\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\\\/ipsc2022\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\\\/ipsc2022\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\\\/ipsc2022\\\/\",\"name\":\"2022 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\\\/ipsc2022\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0 - 2022 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/important-dates-schedule\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0 - 2022 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference","og_description":"IMPORTANT DATES May 15, 2022:\u00a0 Deadline for Submission of Requests to Present (with title and abstract) and Request to Attend June 1, 2022: Notification of Accepted Presentations August 1, 2022: Deadline for Submission of Paper Drafts SCHEDULE* Subject to change Wednesday, August 10, 2022 6:00 PM PST – Shuttle begins service between the Westin Palo […]","og_url":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/important-dates-schedule\/","og_site_name":"2022 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference","article_modified_time":"2022-08-11T16:28:40+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/important-dates-schedule\/","url":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/important-dates-schedule\/","name":"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0 - 2022 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-09-07T19:00:33+00:00","dateModified":"2022-08-11T16:28:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/important-dates-schedule\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/important-dates-schedule\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/important-dates-schedule\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Important Dates & Schedule\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/#website","url":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/","name":"2022 Intellectual Property Scholars Conference","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/25","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/25\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/ipsc2022\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}