{"id":97,"date":"2020-12-11T03:44:48","date_gmt":"2020-12-11T03:44:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/?page_id=97"},"modified":"2021-03-08T18:10:54","modified_gmt":"2021-03-08T18:10:54","slug":"legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/","title":{"rendered":"Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\n    A four-session virtual event exploring how digital technologies are reshaping the civil justice system\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\n    <strong><br \/>\n        February 10, 17, 24, &amp; March 3, 2021 at 9:00am to 10:30am PST<br \/>\n    <\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>Legal tech, most agree, is transforming litigation and law practice, and its steady advance has tapped a rich vein of anxiety about the future of the legal profession. Much of the resulting debate has a defensive quality in its focus on what legal tech portends for the professional authority, and profitability, of lawyers. Much of it is also profoundly futurist\u2014full of references to \u201crobolawyers\u201d and \u201crobojudges.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Lost in this rush to foretell a distant, robotic future are an array of more concrete and more pressing concerns: What is the current state of legal tech and where can it plausibly go in the near- to medium-term? What effect will legal tech\u2019s continued advance \u2014 from e-discovery to outcome prediction engines to virtual trials and proceedings \u2014 have on core features of our litigation system, and how should our procedural rules adapt in response? How can new digital technologies expand access to justice for low- and moderate-income individuals who often cannot retain counsel or lack the resources or know-how to engage formal legal institutions? And what aspects of judicial administration\u2014particularly data infrastructure and accessibility\u2014need to change in order to promote fair and responsible development of legal technologies and open the doors of justice wider for all? Debate around each of these questions, already heated, is quickening in light of the deep disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p\n    class=\"larger-body-text\"\n    style=\"text-align: center;\"\n><br \/>\n    <strong><br \/>\n        This four-session event is designed for judges, court administrators, rulemakers, legislators, academics, practitioners, and entrepreneurs who want to better understand the intersection of legal technology and civil justice and help navigate change in a post-COVID world.<br \/>\n    <\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\n    <a class=\"btn\" href=\"https:\/\/stanford.zoom.us\/meeting\/register\/tJMtce2spjMpH93FHRLXctlvWnU0YhQeNB-8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">REGISTER<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"mod-h2\">Speakers:<\/h2>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-23\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Armour_John-Oxford-Law-300x300.png\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"300\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>John Armour<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Oxford University Law Faculty<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-25 size-full\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Barton_Ben-Tennessee-SQUARE-e1607633014660.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"256\"\n            height=\"256\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Ben Barton<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>University of Tennessee College of Law<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-83 size-full\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/12\/Byrom_Natalie-SQUARE-e1607633048651.png\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"184\"\n            height=\"184\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Natalie Byrom<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>The Legal Education Foundation, Former Expert Advisor, Her Majesty\u2019s Courts and Tribunal Service<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-71 size-full\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/12\/Cuellar_Tino_Justice-SQUARE-e1607657696845.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"167\"\n            height=\"167\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Justice Mariano-Florentino Cu\u00e9llar<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Supreme Court of California<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-27 size-full\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Danser_Renee-Harvard-Justice-Lab-SQUARE-e1607657710519.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"191\"\n            height=\"191\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Renee Danser<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Harvard Law School, The Access to Justice Lab<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-29\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Engstrom_David-300x300.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"300\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>David Freeman Engstrom<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Stanford Law School<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-31\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Engstrom_Nora-SLS-300x300.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"300\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Nora Freeman Engstrom<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Stanford Law School<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-33 size-medium\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Frankenreiter_Jens-Columbia-SQUARE-e1607657777857-300x300.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"300\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Jens Frankenreiter<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Columbia Law School<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-35 size-full\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Gelbach_Jonah-Berkeley-Law-SQUARE-e1607657792235.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"202\"\n            height=\"202\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Jonah Gelbach<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Berkeley Law<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-75 size-medium\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/12\/Gilles_Myriam-Cardozo-SQUARE-e1607657838823-300x300.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"300\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Myriam Gilles<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Cardozo School of Law<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-37 size-full\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Greiner_James-Harvard-Justice-Lab-SQUARE-e1607657851114.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"200\"\n            height=\"200\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Jim Greiner<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Harvard Law School, The Access to Justice Lab<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-73 size-medium\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/12\/Grimm_Paul-Judge-e1607657961165-300x300.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"300\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Judge Paul Grimm<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>United States District Court for the District of Maryland<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-88 size-full\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/12\/Hadfield_Gillian-Toronto-SQUARE-e1607657976985.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"170\"\n            height=\"170\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Gillian Hadfield<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>University of Toronto Law Faculty, Schwartz Reisman Institute for Technology and Society<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-39\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Hagan_Margaret-SLS-300x300.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"300\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Margaret Hagan<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Stanford Law School, The Legal Design Lab<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-41 size-full\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/McCormack_Bridget-Michigan-Supreme-Court-SQUARE-e1607657999431.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"183\"\n            height=\"183\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Chief Justice Bridget M. McCormack<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Michigan Supreme Court<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-43\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Nyarko_Julian-SLS-300x300.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"300\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Julian Nyarko<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Stanford Law School<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-45 size-full\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Prescott-J.J.-Michigan-Law-Matterhorn-SQUARE-e1607658022494.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"252\"\n            height=\"252\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>J.J. Prescott<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>University of Michigan Law School, Founder, Matterhorn<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-47\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Quintanilla_Victor-Indiana-Law-300x300.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"300\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Victor D. Quintanilla<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Maurer School of Law \u2013 Indiana<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-77 size-full\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/12\/Rosenthal_Lee-Judge-SQUARE-e1607658040622.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"292\"\n            height=\"292\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Chief Judge Lee Rosenthal<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-49 size-full\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Rostain_Tanina-Georgetown-Law-Justice-Lab-SQUARE-e1607658054963.png\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"197\"\n            height=\"197\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Tanina Rostain<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Georgetown University Law Center, The Justice Lab<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-51\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Sako_Mari-Oxford-300x300.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"300\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Mari Sako<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Sa\u00efd Business School, Oxford University<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-79 size-medium\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/12\/Slayton_David-SQUARE-e1607658083233-300x300.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"300\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>David Slayton<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Office of Court Administration, State of Texas<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-53\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/11\/Spaulding_Norman-SLS-300x300.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"300\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Norman Spaulding<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>Stanford Law School<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-81 size-full\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/12\/Yoon_Albert-Toronto-e1607658122979.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"170\"\n            height=\"170\"\n        ><br \/>\n        <strong>Albert Yoon<\/strong><br \/>\n        <i>University of Toronto Law Faculty, Co-Founder, Blue J Legal<\/i>\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr>\n<h2>Session 1<\/h2>\n<h3>\n    Legal Tech and the Innovation Ecosystem<br \/>\n<\/h3>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-wrapper-2\">\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        Wednesday, February 10, 2021<br \/>\n9:00am to 10:30am PST<br \/>\nLive Virtual Event<br \/>\nFree, open to all<\/p>\n<p>        <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=WcNy-H0amNc&amp;feature=youtu.be\">Video to Session 1<\/a>\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n<ul>\n<li>\n                Julian Nyarko, Jens Frankenreiter\n            <\/li>\n<li>Mari Sako, John Armour<\/li>\n<li>Ben Barton<\/li>\n<li>\n                Commentary by: Justice Mariano-Florentino Cu\u00e9llar, Gillian Hadfield\n            <\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"small-body-text\">\n    This session will anchor the sessions to come by providing an overview of the state of \u201clegal tech,\u201d from e-discovery and technology-assisted review (TAR) to software that performs advanced legal analytics and outcome prediction, online dispute resolution (ODR) platforms that many courts have begun to deploy, and a growing catalog of digital tools that serve the unrepresented. Drawing together experts on machine learning, the organization of the legal services industry, and legal ethics and lawyer regulation, this session will provide a portrait of the current state of the art and legal tech\u2019s likely trajectory over the near- to medium-term.\n<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr>\n<h2>Session 2<\/h2>\n<h3>\n    Legal Tech, Procedure, and the Future of Adversarialism<br \/>\n<\/h3>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-wrapper-2\">\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        Wednesday, February 17, 2021<br \/>\n9:00am to 10:30am PST<br \/>\nLive Virtual Event<br \/>\nFree, open to all\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n<ul>\n<li>Norman Spaulding<\/li>\n<li>\n                Nora Freeman Engstrom, David Freeman Engstrom\n            <\/li>\n<li>Jim Greiner, Renee Danser<\/li>\n<li>\n                Commentary by: Judge Paul Grimm, Myriam Gilles\n            <\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"small-body-text\">\n    This session will consider the implications of the new tech tools for civil litigation and the adversarial system, particularly the ways civil procedure rules may need to adapt as legal tech continues its advance. We will consider, among other things, legal tech\u2019s implications for due process and meaningful participation within the legal system; the promise and peril of the migration to remote proceedings, including virtual trials; and the ways continued advances in legal technologies will shift and perhaps even re-set several of the system\u2019s procedural cornerstones, from proportionality in discovery to the work product doctrine.\n<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr>\n<h2>Session 3<\/h2>\n<h3>\n    Legal Tech and Access to Justice<br \/>\n<\/h3>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-wrapper-2\">\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        Wednesday, February 24, 2021<br \/>\n9:00am to 10:30am PST<br \/>\nLive Virtual Event<br \/>\nFree, open to all<\/p>\n<div>\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/X31czG4NbBc\">Video to Session 3<\/a>\n        <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n<ul>\n<li>Margaret Hagan<\/li>\n<li>\n                Chief Justice Bridget M. McCormack\n            <\/li>\n<li>Victor D. Quintanilla<\/li>\n<li>J.J. Prescott<\/li>\n<li>\n                Commentary by: Chief Judge Lee Rosenthal, David Slayton\n            <\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"small-body-text\">\n    This session will focus in on the distributive effects of new legal technologies within the civil justice system. If the 2008-2009 Great Recession is any guide, the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic will trigger a spike in consumer credit and eviction cases, placing substantial pressure on state courts to innovate, including expanded use of virtual hearings, pre-hearing diversion programs, and court-ordered online dispute resolution processes. The coming surge will also bring to a boil an already-simmering debate about the high prevalence of pro se litigants within the system. All of these issues raise important questions about the degree to which the uptake of new legal technologies, and the rules governing their use, will widen or narrow the gap between litigation\u2019s \u201chaves\u201d and its \u201chave nots\u201d\u2014a core concern of anyone working within the civil justice field.\n<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr>\n<h2>Session 4<\/h2>\n<h3>\n    Access to Data as Access to Justice<br \/>\n<\/h3>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-wrapper-2\">\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n        Wednesday, March 3, 2021<br \/>\n9:00am to 10:30am PST<br \/>\nLive Virtual Event<br \/>\nFree, open to all<\/p>\n<div>\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=YvqD9L5GUrc&amp;feature=youtu.be\">Video to Session 4<\/a>\n        <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box\">\n<ul>\n<li>Tanina Rostain<\/li>\n<li>Jonah Gelbach<\/li>\n<li>Albert Yoon<\/li>\n<li>Commentary by: Natalie Byrom<\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"small-body-text\">\n    This final session will focus in on a concern that is gaining momentum among civil justice experts: that relatively few actors within the legal system have privileged access to the data necessary to develop and refine effective legal tech tools. Put more concretely, high data costs and the failure of federal and state judicial administrators to make court data available in bulk means that large, corporate-facing tech companies and defense-side BigLaw firms\u2014and typically not plaintiff-side firms, access-to-justice groups, or civil justice institutions\u2014have the data and technical know-how necessary to make effective use of potent new analytics. This session will educate actors within the system\u2014from judges to advisory committee members\u2014about the challenges of access to court data and its uses and abuses and consider innovative new ways to expand access to court data while protecting privacy interests.\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\n    <a class=\"btn\" href=\"https:\/\/stanford.zoom.us\/meeting\/register\/tJMtce2spjMpH93FHRLXctlvWnU0YhQeNB-8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">REGISTER<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Made possible by Stanford Law School in conjunction with the American Association for Justice Robert L. Habush Endowment and Stanford Institute on Human-Centered AI.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-wrapper-2 container-70\">\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box-3\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone wp-image-100 size-medium\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/12\/PS_2C_PMS_H_Red-Grey-print-300x27.png\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"27\"\n        >\n    <\/div>\n<div class=\"conf-grid-box-3\">\n        <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\"\n            class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-91\"\n            src=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/101\/2020\/12\/unnamed-300x56.jpg\"\n            alt=\"\"\n            width=\"300\"\n            height=\"56\"\n        >\n    <\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A four-session virtual event exploring how digital technologies are reshaping the civil justice system February 10, 17, 24, &amp; March 3, 2021 at 9:00am to 10:30am PST Legal tech, most agree, is transforming litigation and law practice, and its steady advance has tapped a rich vein of anxiety about the future of the legal profession. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":37,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-97","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice - Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice - Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A four-session virtual event exploring how digital technologies are reshaping the civil justice system February 10, 17, 24, &amp; March 3, 2021 at 9:00am to 10:30am PST Legal tech, most agree, is transforming litigation and law practice, and its steady advance has tapped a rich vein of anxiety about the future of the legal profession. [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-03-08T18:10:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice - Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-11T03:44:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-08T18:10:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/\",\"name\":\"Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice - Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice - Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice","og_description":"A four-session virtual event exploring how digital technologies are reshaping the civil justice system February 10, 17, 24, &amp; March 3, 2021 at 9:00am to 10:30am PST Legal tech, most agree, is transforming litigation and law practice, and its steady advance has tapped a rich vein of anxiety about the future of the legal profession. [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/","og_site_name":"Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice","article_modified_time":"2021-03-08T18:10:54+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/","url":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/","name":"Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice - Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-12-11T03:44:48+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-08T18:10:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/#website","url":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/","name":"Legal Tech and the Future of Civil Justice","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/97","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/37"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/97\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/conferences.law.stanford.edu\/legal-tech-and-the-future-of-civil-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}