May 15, 2022: Deadline for Submission of Requests to Present (with title and abstract) and Request to Attend
June 1, 2022: Notification of Accepted Presentations
August 1, 2022: Deadline for Submission of Paper Drafts
Subject to change
6:00 PM PST – Shuttle begins service between the Westin Palo Alto and Stanford Law School
* The shuttle loop between the Westin Palo Alto and Stanford Law School until 9:00 PM
6:00 PM PST – COVID-19 Check-in Begins
Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
7:00 PM – 8:30 PM PST – Informal Opening Reception
Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
7:00 AM PST – Shuttle departs from the Westin Palo Alto to Stanford Law School
* The shuttle will loop between the Westin Palo Alto to Stanford Law School until 9:00 AM PST.
7:45 AM – 8:50 AM PST – Registration, COVID-19 Check-in & Breakfast
Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
8:50 AM – 9:00 AM PST – Welcome & Opening Remarks
Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
9:00 AM – 10:50 AM PST – Opening Plenary Session: Under-Represented Groups in the IP System
Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
10:50 AM PST – 11:10 AM PST – Break
Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
11:10 AM – 1:00 PM PST – Breakout Session I – Day One
Paul Brest Hall (PBH) and Classroom Building, Stanford Law School
Room 90 | PBH West | Room 85 | Room 180 | PBH East | Room 95 |
Copyright: Music & Authorship | Copying & Security | Global Competition & Exchange | IP & Pandemic Preparedness | Patentability Requirements | Trade Secrets |
Co-authorship in Comparative Perspective: Intentions, Relations, and Implications – Carys Craig, Luke McDonagh, and Daniele Simone | Minding Copying-in-Fact’s Evidentiary Gaps – Joseph Scott Miller |
Privacy and/or Trade – Anupam Chander and Paul Schwartz | The False Promise of Price Controls on Drug Patents: A Legal and Policy Analysis of the Bayh-Dole Act and § 1498 – Adam Mossoff | What’s the Use of Patent Utility? – David Olson | Shifting from Patents to Trade Secrets – Michael Risch |
Measuring the Harms of Unauthorized Campaign Music – Jake Linford and Aaron Perzanowski | Right Hand, Meet Left Hand: How Copyright Law Undermines Cybersecurity – Cathy Gellis | Procurement Institutions and Essential Drug Supply in Low and Middle-Income Countries – Lucy Xiaolu Wang and Nahim Bin Zahur | Vaccines’ Intellectual Property and Access to Health – Ana Alba-Betancourt, Laura Vidal, and Luna Mancini | The Antibody Paradox – Mark Lemley and Jake Sherkow | Curiosities of Standing in Trade Secret Law – Charles Tait Graves |
Copyright and Nashville Songwriters: A Qualitative Study – Joseph Fishman | An Empirical Study of the DMCA’s Anti-Circumvention Provisions – Clark Asay | U.S. Law of Geographical Trademarks, “Google Effects,” Historical Developments, and U.S. International Obligations: Proposal for Changes to the Lanham Act – Marketa Trimble | Centralizing Pharmaceutical Innovation – Sapna Kumar | The Substantial Role of Patent (In)Eligibility in Promoting Artificial Intelligence Innovation – Nikola Datzov | Publicizing Corporate Secrets – Christopher Morten |
Abuse of Copyright: Intervention into Racial Inequity – Margaret Chon and Olufunmilayo Arewa | What the Mexican Supreme Court Can Learn from the CJEU’s Constitutionality Decision of the New EU’s Notice-and-Staydown System – Cesar Ramirez -Montes | Transnational Competition: From Enforcement of Foreign Unfair Competition Judgments to Global Trademarks – Naama Daniel |
Deferring Intellectual Property Rights in Pandemic Times – Peter Yu | Assessing Evidence of Secondary Consideration – Jason Reincke | A Psychology of Trade Secrecy – Jeanne Fromer |
Anti-Intellectualism in American Intellectual Property – Sepehr Shahshahani | The Employee’s Right to Learn – Sharon K. Sandeen |
1:00 PM PST – 2:00 PM PST – Lunch
Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
2:00 PM – 3:50 PM PST – Breakout Session 2 – Day One
Paul Brest Hall (PBH) and Classroom Building, Stanford Law School
Room 90 | Room 85 | PBH East | PBH West | Room 180 | Room 95 |
Copyright: Fair Use | International IP | IP Examination & Applications | IP, Competition, & Market Power | Knowledge Transfer after COVID | Trademarks and Branding |
Unfair Use – Becky Chambers | Infringement as Artefact: The Curious Case of Paramount Pictures v Rup Kamal Chitra – Arpan Banerjee | Investigating Patent Examination Quality – Jonathan H. Ashtor | Mandatory Infringement – Charles Duan | Compelling Trade Secret Transfers – Dave Levine and Josh Sarnoff | Sound Marks – Deborah R. Gerhardt and Jon J. Lee |
Of Free and Fair Use – Ben Depoorter and Gideon Parchomovsky | Revisiting Section 3(d): Can you Patent Incremental Innovation in India? – Gargi Chakrabarti and Lopamudra Dutta
(ZOOM) |
Deadlines versus Continuous Incentives: Evidence from the Patent Office – Melissa Wasserman and Michael Frakes | Noisy Patent Signals – Greg Reilly | Emergency Accessibility and Intellectual Property Rights: A Trenchant Study of Monopoly Medicine and Public Health Negotiation – Gayathri Venugopal
(ZOOM) |
Trademark Free Riders – Michael Grynberg |
Transforming Fairness: Recent Cases, the Public Interest, and the Fairness Factors – Lisa Macklem | Balancing Intellectual Property Rights and Privacy Rights: Comparative Analysis of European Union, United States and Russian Legislation – Elena Beier |
Unpacking Provisional Patent Applications – Neel Sukhatme, Alexander Giczy, and Andrew Toole | Gendering Antitrust – Jennifer Sturiale | Access to Undisclosed Know-how – Joy Xiang | A Consumer’s Real Interest in Trademark Registration – Rebecca Curtin |
Fair Use After Google v. Oracle – Michael Carroll and Peter Jaszi | Does the EU Market Need an eBay-like Case? Evidence Against Granting Automatic Preliminary Injunctions in Europe – Stefania Fusco and Valerio Sterzi
(ZOOM) |
Seeing Innovation Differently: Scope and Meaning of Divergences in Examiner and Applicant Patent Citations – Richard Gruner | The Emperor’s New Copyright – Kristelia García | Multinational Bounded Entities and International Technology Transfer – Peter Lee | Social Uses of TM – Stephanie Plamondon Bair, Clark Asay, and LaReina Hingson |
Copyright’s Examiners – Zahr K. Said |
3:50 PM PST – 4:10 PM PST – Break
Cooley Courtyard, Stanford Law School
4:10 PM – 6:00 PM PST – Breakout Session 3 – Day One
Paul Brest Hall (PBH) and Classroom Building, Stanford Law School
Room 90 | Room 95 | PBH West | Room 85 | PBH East | Room 180 |
Creation Ownership | IP & Tech in Everyday Life | IP Standards | Language, Speech, & IP | Patent Litigation | Pharma & Medical Innovations |
Measuring the Inventor’s Contribution – Chris Storm | Intangible: How Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks Shape Our Lives, from Startups to Drugs to Taylor Swift and Why Recipe Blogs Are So Darn Long – Christa Laser | FRAND Arbitration Will Destroy FRAND – Barbara Lauriat | What Is the Relationship Between Language and Thought?: Linguistic Relativity and Its Implications for Section 230 and Copyright – Christopher S. Yoo | The Federal Circuit’s Experimental Prism – Jeremy Bock | Reframing Pharma – Emily Michiko Morris |
There’s No Such Thing as Independent Creation, and It’s a Good Thing Too – Christopher Buccafusco | Intellectual Property Is Theft! – Madhavi Sunder | Reviewing a Sense of Growing International Divergence in Standard-Essential Patents Enforcement – Christoph Rademacher | The Right to Speak a Brand: Rethinking the Interaction Between Trademarks and Speech in the Age of Expressive Branding – Alvaro Fernandez-Mora | Real-World Prior Art – Jonathan Masur and Lisa Ouellette | Intellectual Property and Assisted Reproductive Technology – Past, Present and Future – Jorge Contreras, David Cyranoski, and Victoria Carrington |
The Neglected Role of the Family in Copyright – Tal Itkin |
Unwired: Gaining Control over Addictive Technologies – Gaia Bernstein | SEP Licensing in the Automotive Sector: The New Technological Battleground – Manveen Singh | Trademarks, Free Speech, and Inherently Valuable Expression – Lisa Ramsey | Holistic Claim Construction in District Courts – Lidiya Mishchenko | Rethinking the Role of Innovation at FDA – Nicholson Price, Rachel Sachs, and Patricia Zettler |
The Revolution Has Arrived: AI Authorship and Copyright Law – Ryan Abbott and Elizabeth Shubov | Judicial Dialogue and the Patent System – Karen Walsh | The Extended Self: A Framework for Information Rights – Mala Chatterjee | Pluralizing the PHOSITA in Patent Law – Lucas Osborn | ||
Quantum Standards Development Organizations & Their Patent Policies – Tabrez Ebrahim |
6:00 PM PST – 8:00 PM PST – Reception and Dinner
Paul Brest Hall, Munger Graduate Complex
7:00 AM PST – Shuttle departs from the Westin Palo Alto to Stanford Law School
* The shuttle will loop between the Westin Palo Alto to Stanford Law School until 9:00 AM.
7:45 AM – 8:50 AM PST – Registration, COVID-19 Check-in, and Breakfast
Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
8:50 AM – 10:40 AM PST – Breakout Session 4 – Day Two
Paul Brest Hall (PBH) and Classroom Building, Stanford Law School
PBH West | Room 180 | Room 85 | PBH East | Room 95 | Room 90 |
Design & Digital Goods | Empirical IP | IP & Administrative Agencies | IP Considerations in Bio | IP, AI, & Data | Science & Technology Policy |
A Theory of Legal Protection for Industrial Design – Christopher Sprigman and Jeanne C. Fromer | Do Secondary Patents Affect Innovation? Evidence from a “Counterfactual” Orange Book – Maya Durvasula and Gideon Moore | Balancing the Scales? The Impact of Discretionary Denials on Patent Assertion and Defense – Katelyn Chouteau Meylor, Alexander Evelson, Gabriel Faria Bernardes, Kimberly Ann Heng, Erich Remiker, Nik Shiva, VinhHuy Tran Le, and Shawn Miller | A Root Cause Analysis of American Biological Patent Thickets – Bernard Chao and Rachel Moodie | Resolving Online Content Infringement Disputes with the Use of AI Technology – Faye Wang
(ZOOM) |
The Department of Science and Technology – Andres Sawicki |
Trademark Law in the Metaverse – Mark McKenna | The Federal Circuit Dataset Project – Jason Rantanen | Patent Timing – Sarah R. Wasserman Rajec | Marching Backward to Move Forward: Speeding Emergency Access to Patented Drugs under the Bayh-Dole Act – Gary Pulsinelli | Appropriation of Data-driven Persona – Zahra Takhshid |
Property and Power on the Endless Frontier – Dan Traficonte |
Synthetic Data and Rights-respecting Innovation – Orla Lynskey and Michal Gal | The Impact of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Foreign Applicants’ Citation Behaviors: Evidence from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan – Thomas Y. Lu and Wei-Cheng Chen | The Coming Copyright Judge Crisis – Saurabh Vishnubhakat and Dave Fagundes | Venturing Into Health – Rachel Sachs |
The Right of Publicity: A New Framework for Regulating Facial Recognition – Jason Schultz |
The Nigerian Chemical Tank Farms and Chemprenuers: Domesticating Indigenous Innovation in Developing Countries – JohnJohn Uket, Mfon Eneobong, Jacob Bassey and Monilola Udoh
(ZOOM) |
Intellectual Property and the Manufacture of Aura – Stefan Bechtold and Chris Sprigman | Preliminary Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases: Repairing Irreparable Harm – John C. Jarosz, Jorge Contreras, Robert Vigil, and Ivan Maryanchyk | Administering Copyright – Zvi S. Rosen | Valuing Medical Innovation – Lisa Ouellette and Daniel Hemel | AI as Inventor in the Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence – Chris Mammen | Redefining Progress as Diversity in Inventorship – Colleen Chien |
10:40 AM – 11:00 AM PST – Break
Cooley Courtyard, Stanford Law School
11:00 AM – 12:50 PM PST – Breakout Session 5 – Day Two
Paul Brest Hall (PBH) and Classroom Building, Stanford Law School
Room 90 | PBH East | Room 85 | PBH West | Room 95 | Room 180 |
IP & Governance Reform | IP in NFTs & Patent Reform | IP Strategies | IP Theory & History | Morality, Social Constructs, & Creation | Patent Venue Shopping & Crowding |
Externalities, Scarcity and Abundance – Brett Frischmann and Giovanni B. Ramello | Governing NFT Transactions: An Intellectual Property-Oriented Model – Jyh-An Lee and Runhua Wang | Revealing When Companies Choose Inside Counsel: A Case Study from Patents – David Schwartz and Christopher Cotropia | The Pleasures of IP – David A. Simon and Patrick Goold | Patents in Action – Dan L Burk
(ZOOM) |
An Empirical Examination of Venue in Patent Cases – Amy Semet |
Copyright, Uniqueness, Norms, and Talent: How Drag Queens Govern Intellectual Property Without Law – Eden Sarid | Fixing ReDigi: NFT Tethered Sound Recordings – Zachary L. Catanzaro | Reserving the Right to Invent – Lorelei Ritchie | The Macroeconomics of Intellectual Property – Eric E Johnson | Contextual Disclosure for Patenting AI Inventions – Phoebe Li | Welcome to Waco! The Impact of Judge-Shopping on Litigation – Brian J. Love and Christian Helmers |
Reciprocity in Knowledge Governance Policy – Jeremy Sheff | Noticing Patents – Jay Thomas | My Fair Lady: Revisiting Brand Name Change Through a Strategic Lens – Mayuree Sengupta
(ZOOM) |
Copyright Rebooted – Oren Bracha and Talha Syed | Loyalties v. Royalties – Sarah Polcz | Why Do Judges Compete for (Patent) Cases? –Paul Gugliuzza and Jonas Anderson |
“Litigating” Inventor Business Form – Shawn Miller | Evaluating Patent Reform Instruments – Michael Meurer, Janet Freilich, Mark Schankerman, and Florian Schuett | The Conduit Theory of Secondary Liability – TJ Chiang | Learned Hand’s Copyright Law – Shyam Balganesh | Based on a True Story: Life Story Rights, Modularity, and the Propertization of the Self – Dave Fagundes and Jorge Contreras | Interdisciplinary Inventions and Eligibility: Artificial Intelligence Patentability in Life Sciences and Information Technology – Samantha Zyontz |
Private Law Theory: Assimilating IP Into the New Private Law – Robert MergesA Matter of Facts: The Evolution of the Copyright Fact-Exclusion and its Implications for Disinformation and Democracy – Jessica Silbey |
Forum Crowding – Tejas Narechania, Tian Kisch, and Delia Scoville |
12:50 PM – 1:50 PM PST – Lunch
Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
1:50 PM – 3:40 PM PST – Closing Plenary Session: IP in the Courts
Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
3:40 PM PST – Closing Remarks
Paul Brest Hall, Munger Complex
2:00 PM PST – Shuttle begins service between the Stanford Law School and the Westin Palo Alto
* The shuttle will loop between the Westin Palo Alto to Stanford Law School until 4:00 PM.